Things I've learnt about shopping

There should have been a bank holiday on Monday. In the old days we called it Whitsun. In recent years we've called it something bureaucratic like 'late May bank holiday'. This year we call it 'the jubilee weekend' and the government has decided we have to have it next week because we all run our lives based around the queen.

I took the day off work, on principle. Unfortunately I had to go shopping.

I don't really do shopping. I might like shopping for clothes if I was younger, richer or thinner. Unfortunately these three things have never happened concurrently. Instead, I panic buy once or twice a year when one of the following happen: a business meeting/conference/job interview; the realisation that none of my clothes fit; or the shock arrival of summer.

So I went shopping this week. But it wasn't too painful.

I learnt a few annoying thing:
When it's summer, the summer clothes are 'just finishing'.
If a shop categorises its sizes as S, M, L etc, chances are that L does not mean size 16.

And I learnt a few encouraging things:
Half the women I saw were fatter than me. (Yes, I know it shouldn't matter. I'm just shallow. Or vain. Or something.)
Of those who were thinner than me, at least half were worse dressed. Maxi dresses? Playsuits? (Is that even a real word?)
Brothel creepers are in the shops. Which means my footwear is on trend again.
Vintage-style lacy dresses are in all the shops. Which means my genuine vintage lacy dress is on trend too. Now, I just need to check whether it still fits...

Complaining about The 70s: BBC response

I recently wrote to the BBC to complain about the bias in their programme The 70s. This was the reply. It came from the Complaints department when I would really have liked to have heard from the producers.

"Thanks for contacting us about ‘The 70s’, broadcast on BBC Two.

I understand you feel the programme afforded bias against the Labour Party and trade unions.

‘The 70s’ presented by historian Dominic Sandbrook, looked at the closing years of the 70s in Britain. It is not always possible or practical to reflect all the different opinions on a subject within individual programmes like ‘The 70s’. Editors are charged to ensure that over a reasonable period they reflect the range of significant views, opinions and trends in their subject area. The BBC does not seek to denigrate any view, nor to promote any view. It seeks rather to identify all significant views, and to test them rigorously and fairly on behalf of the audience.

Senior editorial staff, the Executive Committee and the BBC Trust keep a close watch on programmes to ensure that standards of impartiality are maintained.

However, I appreciate your frustration with the impartiality and stadard of the programme and so please be assured we appreciate your feedback on this, and therefore we have registered your comments on our audience log. This is a daily report of audience feedback that's made available to many BBC staff, including the producers of the programme, channel controllers and other senior managers.

The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content. They help us understand what is or is not acceptable to viewers in general.

Thanks again for taking the time to contact us."

The 70s: don't believe everything you see on television

Ten years ago, the BBC launched BBC4 with the slogan "Everyone Needs a Place to Think". I wrote to them saying I already have one, thanks very much, and it's called BBC2 (they didn't reply).

Since then, I've gone digital and become a huge BBC4 fan. As for BBC2, it's obviously not a place to think any more. I was looking forward to the new BBC2 series The 70s. I should have known better.

The trailer suggested it would be a serious history programme, but the fact that they used the 1970s BBC2 ident and the funny voice should have given me a clue... and the fact that they programmed yet another music clips show immediately afterwards. They were positioning it as a nostalgia show.

This become immediately obvious when the programme started off with 'What were you doing in the 70s?' This wasn't a history programme, it was 'I love the 70s' with a vaguely intellectual gloss.

And there were the uninformed young on Twitter saying things like 'I wish I was born in the 70s' and 'The 70s seems like such a cool era to grow up in'. Not to mention the ultimate in laziness: 'the decade that taste forgot'.

If you actually grew up in the 70s (as the presenter did not), you'd know there was more to the era than quaint fashions and good music. And much more than Blue Nun and brown furniture. This is my past you're talking about, not some retro theme park.

I'm sure the BBC are delighted that the show's such a great hashtag hit, but most of the people tweeting were idiots, spammers and trolls ('If you're old enough to remember the 70s you're too old to be on Twitter.' F*** off.). The rest were people my age trying to restrain themselves from putting their foot through the television.

Was it supposed to be social history? Was it supposed to be political history? Was it supposed to be a light entertainment clip show? Was it supposed to be true?

Did I say 'vaguely intellectual'? I meant patronising. The guy's written an article for the BBC website which lists a few 1970s cliches and adds 'all of those things, which are so easy to satirise today'. By whom? And why, exactly?

Yes, let's laugh at how unsophisticated everyone was in the 70s. As if we're more sophisticated now, when Simon Cowell's sex life is on the front cover of a newspaper and people actually think that reality television is, well, reality. 

The programme was full of similar unsubstantiated generalisations (including some uncalled-for union bashing). Someone on Twitter called it a Ladybird book; another liked it to GCSE revision notes. It was definitely history lite. Superficial, badly researched, badly presented and not even coherent enough to count as revisionist propaganda.

And it wasn't the 70s that I remember. Sandbrook describes it as an era of affluence: well, we never had any spare money. Or foreign holidays. In the 1970s that I lived in, there was more idealism than consumerism.

What really pisses me off is that a whole load of television viewers (and reviewers) are going to end up thinking that this was what the 70s were really like. Please believe me: they weren't.

I'm not sure whether I can face watching another three episodes. I think I'll just go and watch The Filth And The Fury again. And remind myself how the 1970s actually felt, in the real world.